GUIDED WAVE RADAR LEVEL SENSORS: CALIBRATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Keywords:
measurement uncertainty, calibration, guided wave radar level sensor, dielectric permittivityAbstract
This study presents a detailed uncertainty analysis for guided wave radar level sensors, focusing on the calibration schemes and environmental influence factors. Guided wave radar level sensors are used in numerous industrial applications, especially for harsh environmental conditions. While some of the sensors are designed for technological operations control and do not require extreme precision levels, there are applications where a high level of precision is crucial. The analysis highlights the impact of environmental factors, such as temperature, pressure, and air humidity, on measurement accuracy and calibration effectiveness. Key uncertainty contributions—including those from reference instruments, random noise (signal-to-noise ratio impact), nonlinearity, and dielectric constant variability—are assessed under reference and extended environmental conditions. Results demonstrate that under controlled environments, measurement uncertainties remain within acceptable thresholds. However, when significant environmental variability is introduced, contributions from dielectric constant changes and time estimation noise amplify uncertainty bands, especially for long-range measurements. Practical calibration recommendations are provided to maintain measurement accuracy in controlled and harsh operational conditions. Additionally, the study compares scenarios using high-accuracy calibration setups with cost-effective alternatives for non-critical applications. These comparisons guide sensor manufacturers and metrological regulators in optimizing calibration practices while balancing cost and performance. The findings underscore the importance of compensating for dielectric constant variability in dynamic environments. Future work should explore uncertainty reduction techniques, including real-time correction. The provided insights are instrumental for improving polymetric sensor systems and ensuring reliable level measurements in diverse applications, fostering advancements in industrial automation and process control.
Downloads
References
1. Zivenko, A.V., Nakonechniy, A.G., & Motorkin, D.Y. (2013). Level measurement principles & sensors. Materialy IX mezinarodni vedecko-prackticka conference “Veda a technologie: krok do budoucnosti - 2013”, Dil. 28, Technicke vedy, Prague, 85–90.
2. Zhukov, Yu.D., & Zivenko, O.V. (2020). Intelligent polymetric systems industrial applications. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Information-Communication Technologies & Embedded Systems (ICTES 2020), Mykolaiv, Ukraine, 122–137. Available: https://www.ceur-ws.org/Vol-2762/paper8.pdf.
3. Fellner-Feldegg, H. (1969). Measurement of dielectrics in the time domain. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 73(3), 616–623. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100723a023.
4. Topp, G.C., Davis, J.L., & Annan, A.P. (1980). Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resources Research, 16(3), 574–582.
5. Robinson, D.A., & Friedman, S.P. (2003). A method for measuring the solid particle permittivity or electrical conductivity of rocks, sediments, and granular materials. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 108(B2), 2076. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000691.
6. Nemarich, C.P. (2001). Time domain reflectometry liquid level sensors. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, 4(4), 40–44.
7. Hollywood, P.M. (1997). TDR level measurement. Measurement & Control, 31(6), 94–98.
8. Cataldo, A., Tarricone, L., Attivissimo, F., & Trotta, A. (2008). Simultaneous measurement of dielectric properties and levels of liquids using a TDR method. Measurement, 41(3), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2006.11.006.
9. Younglove, B.A. (1972). Dielectric constant of compressed gaseous and liquid oxygen. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards - A. Physics and Chemistry, 76A(1), January-February, 1–10.
10. Huang, P.H., Ripple, D.C., Moldover, M.R., & Scace, G.E. (2006). A reference standard for measuring humidity of air using a re-entrant radio frequency resonator. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Humidity and Moisture (ISHM 2006), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
11. Chattopadhyay, R. (1997). An empirical formula for computing the dielectric constant of humid air. ResearchGate. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262040448.
12. Santo Zarnik, M., & Belavic, D. (2012). An experimental and numerical study of the humidity effect on the stability of a capacitive ceramic pressure sensor. Radioengineering, 21(1), 201–206.
13. Zhukov, Y.D., Zivenko, A.V., Gudyma, I.A., & Raieva, H.N. (2019). Correction technique for guided wave radar LPG level measurement sensors. Shipbuilding and Marine Infrastructure, 2(12), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.15589/smi2019.2(12).3.
14. Emerson Rosemount. (2019). Technical Note: Using Guided Wave Radar for Level in High Pressure Steam Applications. Available: https://www.emerson.com/documents/automation/technical-note-using-guided-wave-radar-for-level-in-high-pressure-steam-applications-rosemount-en-76264.pdf.
15. Chegrinec, V.N. (2013). Correction of the transformation function of a level measurement by means of the polymetric information system. Vimiryuvalna ta Obchislyuvalna Tekhnika v Tekhnologichnikh Protsesakh, 2, 33–38.
16. International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML). (2008). OIML R 85-1 & 2: Automatic level gauges for measuring the level of liquid in stationary storage tanks. Paris, France: Bureau International de Métrologie Légale (BIML).
17. State Primary Standard of the Unit of Length for the Liquid Level. Available: http://www.metrology.kharkov.ua/index.php?id=347&L=2. Accessed: [29.11.2024].
18. Zivenko, O., Nakonechnyi, A., Motorkin, D., & Gudyma, E. (2013). Automated calibration of level channels in polymetric systems considering the temperature of the electronic unit. Innovations in Shipbuilding and Ocean Engineering, Proceedings of the IV International Scientific and Technical Conference, 424–427. Mykolaiv: National University of Shipbuilding.
19. Nakonechnyi, A.G., & Zivenko, A.V. (2015). Automation of calibration of level measurement channels in polymetric systems. Innovations in Shipbuilding and Ocean Engineering, Proceedings of the VI International Scientific and Technical Conference Dedicated to the 95th Anniversary of Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding, 337–340. Mykolaiv: National University of Shipbuilding.
20. Buck Research Instruments (1996). Buck Research CR-1A User's Manual, Appendix 1.