A CRITICAL REVIEW OF MATHEMATICAL MODELS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31471/1993-9981-2024-2(53)-105-113Keywords:
elasticity, production function, economical growth model.Abstract
The article provides a comprehensive analysis of mathematical models widely used in economic theory to model demand, production, and economic growth. In particular, it demonstrates the application of elasticity, as the economic meaning of a derivative, for constructing a production function and its application to models of economic growth research. Special attention is given to the limitations and challenges faced by researchers when developing and implementing these models. The models discussed are powerful tools for studying economic processes, but each has both strengths and weaknesses that determine their effectiveness and applicability under different conditions. The mathematical component of each model provides a clear understanding of the structure of economic processes and allows for quantitative analysis. However, all these models are based on mathematical formulas and certain assumptions and simplifications, which may limit their applicability in real-world economic conditions. The article also addresses the importance of choosing the correct mathematical methods for analyzing these models. An important aspect is the approach to adapting model parameters to real conditions, which often requires modifications to mathematical expressions and consideration of additional factors. In this context, the role of numerical methods in solving complex systems of equations, as well as the use of optimization and approximation techniques to achieve more accurate results, is emphasized. Despite numerous advantages, mathematical models of economic processes have certain limitations. Their application in the real world often requires accounting for multiple external variables that may not be included in the basic mathematical structures of the models. However, for theoretical research and
the construction of initial estimates, these models are effective tools for understanding and predicting economic processes. In conclusion, all models have important applications, but to maximize their effectiveness, they need to be adjusted to real economic conditions, supplemented with new variables, and account for the dynamic nature of economic processes.
Downloads
References
Bilotserkivskyi O.B.,Shyriaieva N.V., Zamula O.O. Ekonomiko-matematychne modeliuvannia: Tekst lektsii. Kharkiv: NTU «KhPI», 2010. 108 p. [in Ukrainian]
Vitlinskyi V.V. Modeliuvannia ekonomiky: Navch. posibnyk. Kyiv: KNEU, 2003. 408 p. [in Ukrainian]
Vovk V.M., Zomchak L.M. Optymizatsiini modeli ekonomiky Navch. posibnyk. Lviv: LNU imeni Ivana Franka, 2013. 318 p. [in Ukrainian]
Datsko M.V., Karbovnyk M.V. Doslidzhennia operatsii v ekonomitsi: navch. posib. Lviv: PAIS, 2009. 288 p. [in Ukrainian]
Ivashchuk O.T. Ekonomiko-matematychne modeliuvannia: Navchalnyi posibnyk. Ternopil: TNEU «Ekonomichna dumka», 2008. 704 p. [in Ukrainian]
Serediuk V.B. Zastosuvannia ekonomiko-matematychnykh metodiv dlia rozviazannia ekonomichnykh zadach. Visnyk sotsialno-ekonomichnykh doslidzhen. 2014. Vol. 1 (52). P.69-73. [in Ukrainian]
Iankovyi V.O. Ekonomiko-matematychni vlastyvosti vyrobnychoi funktsii Kobba-Duhlasa i CES-funktsii. Skhidna Yevropa: Ekonomika, biznes ta upravlinnia. 2017. Vol. 2 (07). P. 330-336. [in Ukrainian]
Aum Sangmin Why Is the LaborShare Declining? Review. 2020.Vol. 102 (4). P. 413-428. DOI:10.20955/r.102.413-28
Barro Robert J., Sala-i-Martin Xavier. Economic growth. The MIT Press, 2004.
p. 29, fn. 7.
Berndt Ernst R., Christensen Laurits R. The Translog Function and the Substitution of Equipment, Structures, and Labor in U.S. manufacturing 1929–68. Journal of Econometrics. 1973. Vol. 1 (1). P. 81–113. DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(73)90007-9
Boianovsky M. Modeling economic growth: Domar on moving equilibrium CHOPE Working Paper. 2015. No 10. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2664149
Brown Murray. "Cobb–Douglas Functions". The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan UK. 2017. Р. 1–4. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_480-2
Czerwinski A. Mathematics Serving Economics: A Historical Review of Mathematical Methods in Economics. Symmetry. 2024. Vol. 16(10), 1271. DOI: 10.3390/sym16101271
Cobb C. W., Douglas, P. H. A Theory of Production. American Economic Review.1928. Vol. 18. P. 139-165. JSTOR 1811556. Retrieved 26 September 2016.
Douglas Paul H. The Cobb-Douglas Production Function Once Again: Its History, Its Testing, and Some New Empirical Values. Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press.1976. Vol. 84(5). P. 903-915.
Elsby Michael, Hobijn Bart, Sahin Aysegül. The Decline of the U.S. Labor Share (Report). Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Fall 2013.
Filipe Jesus, Adams F. Gerard. The Estimation of the Cobb-Douglas Function: A Retrospective View. Eastern Economic Journal. 2005. Vol. 31 (3). P. 427–445.
Gechert Havranek, Irsova Kolcunova Measuring capital-labor substitution: The importance of method choices and publication bias. Review of Economic Dynamics. 2021. Vol. 45. P.55–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2021.05.003
Hájková Dana, Hurník Jaromír. Cobb-Douglas Production Function: The Case of a Converging Economy. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a User). 2006. Vol. 57 (9–10) P. 465–476.
Hoch Irving. Simultaneous Equation Bias in the Context of the Cobb-Douglas Production Function. Econometrica.1958. Vol.26 (4). P.566–578.DOI: 10.2307/1907517
Houthakker H.S. The Pareto Distribution and the Cobb–Douglas Production Function in Activity Analysis. The Review of Economic Studies. 1955. Vol. 23 (1). P. 27–31. DOI: 10.2307/2296148
Jacques Ian. Mathematics for Economics and Business (Ninth ed.). Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson Education, 2018. 168 p.
Malcolm Pemberton and Nicholas Rau.Mathematics for economists: An introductory textbook, 4th ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 2015.
Nechyba Thomas J. Microeconomics : an intuitive approach with calculus (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. 2017. p. 126.
Silberberg Eugene, Suen, Wing. Elasticity of Substitution. The Structure of Economics: A Mathematical Analysis (Third ed.). Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.2001. Р. 246–247.
Smirnov R., Wang K. The Hamiltonian approach to the problem of derivation of production functions in economic growth theory. 2019. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1906.11224
Solow R.M. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1956. Vol. 70. No 1. P. 65–94.
Solow R.M. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1957. Vol. 39, No 3. P. 312–320.
Uzawa H. Models of Growth . The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Macmillan Publishers Ltd. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2018. P. 8885–8893
Varian Hal. Microeconomic Analysis (Third ed.). New York: Norton, 1992.
Walsh Carl. Monetary Theory and Policy (2nd ed.).Cambridge: MIT Press. 2003.
Wynn R. F., Holden K. An Intro-duction to Applied Econometric Analysis. New York: Halsted Press.1974. P. 62–65.
.png)
