ANALYSIS OF TECHNOLOGIES AND EXPERIMENTAL FACILITIES OF WELLS FLOW STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION IN-LINE DIAGNOSIS FOR THE OIL RECOVERY INCREASING
Keywords:
method, field, well, experimental model, conception, multiphase flow structure, oil recovery.Abstract
A brief analysis of modern achievements in the field of methods and approaches for wells flow diagnosing is conducted. The examples of new field development technology conceptions by the various elements of a full working cycle combining are presented, among which an important place takes the concept of closed loop, as well as the technology of hydrodynamic investigations. The types of gas-liquid mixtures structures movement in the well tube that may result from the gas injection into the flow and have a significant influence on the reservoir oil recovery are described. An analysis of existing technologies and experimental facilities of the wells flow structure and composition in-line diagnosing is conducted. The results of this analysis and the basic requirements for the new technologies implementation that will improve the reservoir oil recovery are presented.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Эрик Тоски, Эволюция измерений многофазных потоков и их влияние на управ¬ление эксплуатацией/ Эрик Тоски, Эммануил Окугбайе, Бертран Теувени, Биргер Велле Ханссен, Джеральд Смит// Нефтегазовое обозрение, 2003. – С.68-77.
2. Economides, M. and Nolte, K.G., 1989, Reservoir stimulation (2nd edition) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ USA).
3. Baker, A., Gaskell, J., Jeffery, J., Thomas, A., Veneruso, T. and Unneland, T., 1995, Permanent monitoring – looking at lifetime reservoir dynamics, Oilfield Rev., 7(4): 32-46.
4. Mus EA, Toskey ED, Bascoul SJF and Norris RJ (2001): “Added Value of a Multiphase Flow Meter in Exploration Well Testing”, paper OTC 13146 presented at the 2001 Offshore Technology Conference held in Houston, Texas, 30 April–3 May 2001.
5. Карпов В.Б. Интеллектуальная скважина - будущее многопластовых месторождений//Нефтяное хозяйство, 2007 - №2 стр. 28-30.
6. Larson TA (2000): “Operational Experience And Utilization Of The Data From The Subsea Multiphase Flow meter In The West Brae Field”, Paper presented at the 18th North Sea Flow Measurement Workshop.
7. Reid G Smith, Geoffrey C Maitland, The Road Ahead to Real-Time Oil & Gas Reservoir Management, Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers: Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Vol 76A, pp. 539-552, 1998.
8. Mehdizadeh P, Perry D, T. (2002): “The role of well testing in recognizing deferred production revenue”, Paper ETCE2002/MANU-29105 presented at the ASME Engineering technology conference on Energy, Feb 4–6, Houston, Texas.
9. Waskoenig H-H, Langhans G, Cimic M, Heil M, Hoog Antink G and Toskey E (2002): “Optimizing Nitrogen Lift Well Clean-up with Multiphase Flow Measurements,” Paper ETCE2002/PROD-29039 presented at the ASME Engineering Technology Conference on Energy, Houston, Texas, 4–6 February 2002.
10. Retnanto A, Weimer B, Kontha INH, Triongko H, Azim A and Kyaw HA (2001): “Production Optimization using Multiphase Well Testing: A Case Study from East Kalimantan, Indonesia,” paper SPE 71556, presented at the 2001 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 30 September–3 October 2001.
11. Santamaria N (1999): “Turnkey Well Testing Services: A successful Modality Measurement in Mexico”, paper presented at 17th International North Sea Flow Measurement Workshop, Oslo, Norway, October 1999.
12. Thesis by Juan Jose Fernandez Alvarez. – Degree of Master of Science. – Petroleum Engineering. – “Design of a High-Pressure Research Flow Loop for the Experimental Investigation of Liquid Loading in Gas Wells”. – December 2008. – 266 p.
13. SINTEF Petroleum Research. Multiphase Transport [Електронний ресурс], режим доступу: http://www.sintef.no/home/topics/oil-and-gas/Flow-Assurance/#/.
14. Institute for Energy Technology. Oil and Gas. Simulator Technology [Електронний ресурс], режим доступу: http://www.ife.no/en/ife/main_subjects_new/petroleum_research/simulationtechnology.
15. Norsk Hidro ASA [Електронний ресурс], режим доступу: http://www.hydro.com/en/.
16. South West Research Institute. Science and Technology. Fluid Dynamics and Multiphase Flow [Електронний ресурс], режим доступу: http://www.swri.org/4org/d18/mechflu/multflo/home.htm.
17. NEL Scottish Enterprise Technology Park. Multiphase Test Rigs [Електронний ресурс], режим доступу: http://www.tuvnel.com/site2/¬subpage/multiphase_and_wet_gas_multiphase_test_rigs.
18. Colorado Engineering Experiment Station. Flow Meter Calibrations and Testing Solutions [Електронний ресурс], режим доступу: http://www.ceesi.com/.
2. Economides, M. and Nolte, K.G., 1989, Reservoir stimulation (2nd edition) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ USA).
3. Baker, A., Gaskell, J., Jeffery, J., Thomas, A., Veneruso, T. and Unneland, T., 1995, Permanent monitoring – looking at lifetime reservoir dynamics, Oilfield Rev., 7(4): 32-46.
4. Mus EA, Toskey ED, Bascoul SJF and Norris RJ (2001): “Added Value of a Multiphase Flow Meter in Exploration Well Testing”, paper OTC 13146 presented at the 2001 Offshore Technology Conference held in Houston, Texas, 30 April–3 May 2001.
5. Карпов В.Б. Интеллектуальная скважина - будущее многопластовых месторождений//Нефтяное хозяйство, 2007 - №2 стр. 28-30.
6. Larson TA (2000): “Operational Experience And Utilization Of The Data From The Subsea Multiphase Flow meter In The West Brae Field”, Paper presented at the 18th North Sea Flow Measurement Workshop.
7. Reid G Smith, Geoffrey C Maitland, The Road Ahead to Real-Time Oil & Gas Reservoir Management, Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers: Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Vol 76A, pp. 539-552, 1998.
8. Mehdizadeh P, Perry D, T. (2002): “The role of well testing in recognizing deferred production revenue”, Paper ETCE2002/MANU-29105 presented at the ASME Engineering technology conference on Energy, Feb 4–6, Houston, Texas.
9. Waskoenig H-H, Langhans G, Cimic M, Heil M, Hoog Antink G and Toskey E (2002): “Optimizing Nitrogen Lift Well Clean-up with Multiphase Flow Measurements,” Paper ETCE2002/PROD-29039 presented at the ASME Engineering Technology Conference on Energy, Houston, Texas, 4–6 February 2002.
10. Retnanto A, Weimer B, Kontha INH, Triongko H, Azim A and Kyaw HA (2001): “Production Optimization using Multiphase Well Testing: A Case Study from East Kalimantan, Indonesia,” paper SPE 71556, presented at the 2001 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 30 September–3 October 2001.
11. Santamaria N (1999): “Turnkey Well Testing Services: A successful Modality Measurement in Mexico”, paper presented at 17th International North Sea Flow Measurement Workshop, Oslo, Norway, October 1999.
12. Thesis by Juan Jose Fernandez Alvarez. – Degree of Master of Science. – Petroleum Engineering. – “Design of a High-Pressure Research Flow Loop for the Experimental Investigation of Liquid Loading in Gas Wells”. – December 2008. – 266 p.
13. SINTEF Petroleum Research. Multiphase Transport [Електронний ресурс], режим доступу: http://www.sintef.no/home/topics/oil-and-gas/Flow-Assurance/#/.
14. Institute for Energy Technology. Oil and Gas. Simulator Technology [Електронний ресурс], режим доступу: http://www.ife.no/en/ife/main_subjects_new/petroleum_research/simulationtechnology.
15. Norsk Hidro ASA [Електронний ресурс], режим доступу: http://www.hydro.com/en/.
16. South West Research Institute. Science and Technology. Fluid Dynamics and Multiphase Flow [Електронний ресурс], режим доступу: http://www.swri.org/4org/d18/mechflu/multflo/home.htm.
17. NEL Scottish Enterprise Technology Park. Multiphase Test Rigs [Електронний ресурс], режим доступу: http://www.tuvnel.com/site2/¬subpage/multiphase_and_wet_gas_multiphase_test_rigs.
18. Colorado Engineering Experiment Station. Flow Meter Calibrations and Testing Solutions [Електронний ресурс], режим доступу: http://www.ceesi.com/.
Downloads
Published
2014-12-01
How to Cite
Райтер, П. М., Кім, А. П., & Цих, В. С. (2014). ANALYSIS OF TECHNOLOGIES AND EXPERIMENTAL FACILITIES OF WELLS FLOW STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION IN-LINE DIAGNOSIS FOR THE OIL RECOVERY INCREASING. METHODS AND DEVICES OF QUALITY CONTROL, (2(33), 39–47. Retrieved from https://mpky.nung.edu.ua/index.php/mpky/article/view/227
Issue
Section
MEASUREMENT OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICS PARAMETERS OF SUBSTANCES
.png)
